Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-03 11:20:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C2E80CB1CBF172F08F0A4FA10997345A9AC78BB83A6C4D1ED9E134B6FA7A866E
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN provides none of substantial evidence to dispute the claim By Citing the bureaucracy that is accused of wrong doing is not proof said bureaucracy is not complicit In illegal actions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841727197855285586
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C2E80CB1CBF172F08F0A4FA10997345A9AC78BB83A6C4D1ED9E134B6FA7A866E
  • createdAtMillis - 1727954430868
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1841727197855285586C2E80CB1CBF172F08F0A4FA10997345A9AC78BB83A6C4D1ED9E134B6FA7A866E