Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-04 02:57:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 390FF954B5158DD1AEE0874ED4A8260895145E2CAB42052DEC03DC3D5D859A72
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN provides none of substantial evidence to dispute the claim By Citing the bureaucracy that is accused of wrong doing is not proof said bureaucracy is not complicit In illegal actions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841727197855285586
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 390FF954B5158DD1AEE0874ED4A8260895145E2CAB42052DEC03DC3D5D859A72
  • createdAtMillis - 1728010651245
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1841727197855285586390FF954B5158DD1AEE0874ED4A8260895145E2CAB42052DEC03DC3D5D859A72