Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-03 13:25:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1EAA0036F5CC89CCE838A31574AAF008B24F4D411FB8EA90D7844112FF6A5583
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN provides none of substantial evidence to dispute the claim By Citing the bureaucracy that is accused of wrong doing is not proof said bureaucracy is not complicit In illegal actions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841727197855285586
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1EAA0036F5CC89CCE838A31574AAF008B24F4D411FB8EA90D7844112FF6A5583
  • createdAtMillis - 1727961930254
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18417271978552855861EAA0036F5CC89CCE838A31574AAF008B24F4D411FB8EA90D7844112FF6A5583