Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-03 01:01:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 25DBAED101DFAD0E4D2B72AC30B1E4330CA892423F7650F9243C44A94671B8A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The supplied evidence to support a CN has, on itself, a pending note, making it an unreliable source. Regardless, the quote is factual. Any additional context should be relegated to the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841564967478427817
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 25DBAED101DFAD0E4D2B72AC30B1E4330CA892423F7650F9243C44A94671B8A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1727917276676
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184156496747842781725DBAED101DFAD0E4D2B72AC30B1E4330CA892423F7650F9243C44A94671B8A5