Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-02 17:03:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F7FE771CE6443BB97878EBCAB65FC5D57C295C0422A182DF18FCFFC78B1E889F
Participant Details

Original Note:

In context, Vance was not complaining that he was fact checked, he was explaining why he felt it necessary to break the rules of the debate himself to respond to the moderator's fact check. Link to full footage: https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1841290278205866205?t=Jhzrg27Rk1lGwGuShlc64g

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841499640627081510
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F7FE771CE6443BB97878EBCAB65FC5D57C295C0422A182DF18FCFFC78B1E889F
  • createdAtMillis - 1727888588417
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1841499640627081510F7FE771CE6443BB97878EBCAB65FC5D57C295C0422A182DF18FCFFC78B1E889F