Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-03 17:57:14 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: CDB571B0BB3D595F437150E1C7C5F3F5CD29207510FD024BD98166C95DFFA8F9
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Cass Review is not "widely acclaimed". If it was, the author of the original note would have posted more than a link to Wikipedia. In fact, credible critics have found major flaws in the Cass Review's methodology and findings. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/news-and-features/latest-news/detail/2024/04/22/detailed-response-to-the-cass-review%27s-final-report https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/news-events/news/rcpch-responds-publication-final-report-cass-review https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-u-k-s-cass-review-badly-fails-trans-children/ https://www.thepinknews.com/2024/06/24/cass-review-working-group-flaws-trans/
All Note Details