Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-03 03:43:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B3EAE5A624ACC4E4B7F6610FCA13062A4F92CB10B4DD5D21709094FA15C01F0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Obviously this account will think that Walz won the debate. This is clearly a personal opinion, not a fact, as there is no clear “winner” of a debate. Stop abusing community notes to push your agenda.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841437046335758730
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B3EAE5A624ACC4E4B7F6610FCA13062A4F92CB10B4DD5D21709094FA15C01F0
  • createdAtMillis - 1727927017604
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18414370463357587301B3EAE5A624ACC4E4B7F6610FCA13062A4F92CB10B4DD5D21709094FA15C01F0