Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-02 12:50:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C330466CECD35ED894E27F4090DE900102C80B4647C0C7BE31FDFBE5B32DA627
Participant Details

Original Note:

He continues to dispute their fact check. His point being that as they had broke the rules to insert their "fact-check", he had the right to dispute it. Moderators shouldn't be allowed to just lie. https://youtu.be/4Dc83ClqMZM?si=15yCeKqGoIOlbR9l

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841435664253948010
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C330466CECD35ED894E27F4090DE900102C80B4647C0C7BE31FDFBE5B32DA627
  • createdAtMillis - 1727873453516
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1841435664253948010C330466CECD35ED894E27F4090DE900102C80B4647C0C7BE31FDFBE5B32DA627