Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-02 11:01:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF3816827B0B881D133057E2A24A11E86C43B27FEA167EFF631F63FEF863F46A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. La nota que cita a Esade es incorrecta, pues el mismo informe establece que: «Por lo tanto, no se puede descartar que la traslación a precios haya sido del 100%, aunque tampoco se puede descartar que haya sido algo menor» Fuente: https://www.esade.edu/ecpol/es/publicaciones/la-reduccion-del-iva-en-los-alimentos-basicos-evaluacion-y-recomendaciones/ (primer párrafo de las conclusiones)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841400924616503551
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF3816827B0B881D133057E2A24A11E86C43B27FEA167EFF631F63FEF863F46A
  • createdAtMillis - 1727866919963
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1841400924616503551EF3816827B0B881D133057E2A24A11E86C43B27FEA167EFF631F63FEF863F46A