Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-21 21:36:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B9E15B8B3B6597C5ECBB4D33DDC2FC73902646F3F6F6D5E279C1FF51A0CE225
Participant Details

Original Note:

ID:1841359115651891365 単に文章の締めくくりを曖昧な形にしているだけであり、実際に疑問に思っている訳ではないと考えるのが妥当です。 なお、訴訟においても、被告側の「文章を疑問系で書いており、あくまで可能性を示しただけ」という主張が却下された例があります。 https://news.yahoo.co.jp/expert/articles/fed04850521844b804e66576d0954ed08f48f6b9

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841373212116127824
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8B9E15B8B3B6597C5ECBB4D33DDC2FC73902646F3F6F6D5E279C1FF51A0CE225
  • createdAtMillis - 1729546594230
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18413732121161278248B9E15B8B3B6597C5ECBB4D33DDC2FC73902646F3F6F6D5E279C1FF51A0CE225