Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-02 06:54:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A8843B3CBE784D2A74E43AE24C351CF0DC8339A1F37FBE8306C256D207D9477C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: ironically, the proposed CN confuses ECtHR (a court) with ECHR (a convention). As such, a convention is not “located” anywhere and cannot be considered “foreign”, especially considering that the UK had large influence on its proposal and development. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Convention_on_Human_Rights

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841362676422762997
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A8843B3CBE784D2A74E43AE24C351CF0DC8339A1F37FBE8306C256D207D9477C
  • createdAtMillis - 1727852071264
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1841362676422762997A8843B3CBE784D2A74E43AE24C351CF0DC8339A1F37FBE8306C256D207D9477C