Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-02 03:26:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F49C8365226FB6E25DF0D6D143429799BA9EDE8B872EB9B6EAAB6321620BD983
Participant Details

Original Note:

Of course these shots, which only came out 3 years ago under emergency authorization & did not complete the typical years-long vetting, can be reasonably considered 'experimental'. They DO have many adverse effects, also. The post makes no specific claim on DNA. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841287438100222376
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F49C8365226FB6E25DF0D6D143429799BA9EDE8B872EB9B6EAAB6321620BD983
  • createdAtMillis - 1727839563652
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1841287438100222376F49C8365226FB6E25DF0D6D143429799BA9EDE8B872EB9B6EAAB6321620BD983