Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-01 15:33:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AB9FC8027DB68D5DF8AD95A91376568E9D31757D24F3C153369415DBBD20E8DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

ノートID 1841081077596877299 は公明党の提案で「連座制強化」「第三者機関チェック」が盛り込まれたことで賛成したことが書かれておらず、維新案の「10年後領収書公開」のみで賛成したものと誤解を生む文面となっており、コミュニティノートの目的と照らして不適切です。 https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20240619/k10014485371000.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841123453040279973
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AB9FC8027DB68D5DF8AD95A91376568E9D31757D24F3C153369415DBBD20E8DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1727796837464
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1841123453040279973AB9FC8027DB68D5DF8AD95A91376568E9D31757D24F3C153369415DBBD20E8DD