Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-01 09:03:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6B273E94D8E62EAD6A7F5FCF7F2DFE823705A8D0ED5FF6B7B77BC2E31FB583C6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. While the post is indeed lacking a source, the conclusion given by the note is a sentence in the middle of a news article, not the conclusion of the mentioned studies. In other words, it is nothing but the opinion of the article's writer.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1841036622898307545
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6B273E94D8E62EAD6A7F5FCF7F2DFE823705A8D0ED5FF6B7B77BC2E31FB583C6
  • createdAtMillis - 1727773436667
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18410366228983075456B273E94D8E62EAD6A7F5FCF7F2DFE823705A8D0ED5FF6B7B77BC2E31FB583C6