Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-01 04:38:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F51BA222A5E0736EAC655236FDC21AEB7DA980C09082624794F73F588936E3E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

ワクチンは一般に効かないとの事ですが ワクチンの研究には有効性だけでも何万もの研究があり https://x.gd/aoJOI BCGも https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/366365 麻疹ワクチンも https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-30991930395-0/fulltext HPVワクチンも https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14760584.2023.2287135 ランダム化比較試験のメタ解析でその有効性は厳格なエビデンスとして示されています。 また最新のランダム化比較試験のメタアナリシスでもインフルエンザワクチンは対照群と比べ試験条件で一定の有効性が示されています。 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(22)00061-X/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840920210813173778
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F51BA222A5E0736EAC655236FDC21AEB7DA980C09082624794F73F588936E3E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1727757510478
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1840920210813173778F51BA222A5E0736EAC655236FDC21AEB7DA980C09082624794F73F588936E3E5