Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-01 07:17:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 93E1A0AE521F756B71D7B614C38713236391A2101B8DE3A2E6000917BFA3255F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article is considered opinion only and a footnote distances the publishers from the opinion Basically click bait https://www.iol.co.za/opinion/bianca-van-wyk-why-wilgenhof-must-go-b3f13773-ab5e-459e-a166-ce0357ae5bf3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840839537485889663
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 93E1A0AE521F756B71D7B614C38713236391A2101B8DE3A2E6000917BFA3255F
  • createdAtMillis - 1727767066343
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184083953748588966393E1A0AE521F756B71D7B614C38713236391A2101B8DE3A2E6000917BFA3255F