Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-30 19:10:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 63180E06579DCBDABDE1A8E2A054B940212BD6A7F4975FC66225BE70975B46F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

L’étude présentée n’est pas suffisamment fiable scientifiquement pour tirer ces conclusions. Les auteurs eux-mêmes précisent en annexes les problèmes méthodologiques rencontrés. Plusieurs scientifiques remettent en cause méthode et conclusions. Il n’y a pas de consensus. https://x.com/kako_line/status/1746224317778551077?s=46&t=QFY5jM36GQxrLGR9djGBzA

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840809740374516172
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 63180E06579DCBDABDE1A8E2A054B940212BD6A7F4975FC66225BE70975B46F3
  • createdAtMillis - 1727723437099
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184080974037451617263180E06579DCBDABDE1A8E2A054B940212BD6A7F4975FC66225BE70975B46F3