Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-01 00:41:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C90331FC57E6DE2EF07A1D388A509CD00E99330BFB56F75D4F6B0D4A41C40406
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, La fuente está comentada ya en la propia imagen, como opinión personal. Es irrelevante la segunda parte de la propuesta de nota, puede no haberlo oído al estar en el campo. Ademas que que tiene 0 relación con lo comentado en el tweet. Para esto son los comentarios.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840805041692680518
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C90331FC57E6DE2EF07A1D388A509CD00E99330BFB56F75D4F6B0D4A41C40406
  • createdAtMillis - 1727743316906
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1840805041692680518C90331FC57E6DE2EF07A1D388A509CD00E99330BFB56F75D4F6B0D4A41C40406