Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-01 03:06:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C04C9AAF30724B2E9FC1A123C46A5F0BC74FACCBE31EB7FF21048A4FFF52C641
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. “In fact, sex differences in pelvic morphology were large enough to allow sexing the individuals with 100% accuracy”. This sentence immediately precede’s sublime gardener’s quote relating to unreliability of sciatic notch alone (Duric et al, 2005). Ergo, misrepresentation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840794779732365482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C04C9AAF30724B2E9FC1A123C46A5F0BC74FACCBE31EB7FF21048A4FFF52C641
  • createdAtMillis - 1727751983109
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1840794779732365482C04C9AAF30724B2E9FC1A123C46A5F0BC74FACCBE31EB7FF21048A4FFF52C641