Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-30 20:56:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9480B407A2C891D5660F868D608810E6A01062785BF3A2D29FB881932CA5E577
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. “In fact, sex differences in pelvic morphology were large enough to allow sexing the individuals with 100% accuracy”. This sentence immediately precede’s sublime gardener’s quote relating to unreliability of sciatic notch alone (Duric et al, 2005). Ergo, misrepresentation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840794779732365482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9480B407A2C891D5660F868D608810E6A01062785BF3A2D29FB881932CA5E577
  • createdAtMillis - 1727729784581
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18407947797323654829480B407A2C891D5660F868D608810E6A01062785BF3A2D29FB881932CA5E577