Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-01 10:32:11 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3A681EA2F7B8D7D900A98F15889E8BF5DF7412FD2B0D7AEBD62FD739D58586E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. “In fact, sex differences in pelvic morphology were large enough to allow sexing the individuals with 100% accuracy”. This sentence immediately precede’s sublime gardener’s quote relating to unreliability of sciatic notch alone (Duric et al, 2005). Ergo, misrepresentation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840794779732365482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3A681EA2F7B8D7D900A98F15889E8BF5DF7412FD2B0D7AEBD62FD739D58586E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1727778731920
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18407947797323654823A681EA2F7B8D7D900A98F15889E8BF5DF7412FD2B0D7AEBD62FD739D58586E3