Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-30 16:55:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 118E223CE55792EBFF3B7886DFB4B959A37DF37B23C5AB85EB623B230E263CEF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. “In fact, sex differences in pelvic morphology were large enough to allow sexing the individuals with 100% accuracy”. This sentence immediately precede’s sublime gardener’s quote relating to unreliability of sciatic notch alone (Duric et al, 2005). Ergo, misrepresentation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840794779732365482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 118E223CE55792EBFF3B7886DFB4B959A37DF37B23C5AB85EB623B230E263CEF
  • createdAtMillis - 1727715308496
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1840794779732365482118E223CE55792EBFF3B7886DFB4B959A37DF37B23C5AB85EB623B230E263CEF