Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-01 01:18:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60D7942A140A39363F6B7A63EC3DC8332220AB8A47EA8086E48FBE2B56205C1E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nnn - The proposed note is speculation & potentially biased. Godot's word can't be taken at face value as it's clear there have been some wrongful blocks & bans, else there wouldn't be an appeal process. The OP is clearly an opinion based on the mishandling of the situation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840783932066812341
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 60D7942A140A39363F6B7A63EC3DC8332220AB8A47EA8086E48FBE2B56205C1E
  • createdAtMillis - 1727745504108
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184078393206681234160D7942A140A39363F6B7A63EC3DC8332220AB8A47EA8086E48FBE2B56205C1E