Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-01 03:50:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B3F6D0F14F57E2E19376F4A3CB7C8FBD4FAC9A31A3BB46ED23DC81DC0148B282
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The proposed note states an opinion then proceeds to cite two articles which are morning more than two individuals opinions. Sources not reliable, opinion and speculation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840644037726154768
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B3F6D0F14F57E2E19376F4A3CB7C8FBD4FAC9A31A3BB46ED23DC81DC0148B282
  • createdAtMillis - 1727754635589
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1840644037726154768B3F6D0F14F57E2E19376F4A3CB7C8FBD4FAC9A31A3BB46ED23DC81DC0148B282