Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-30 11:04:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B711403D4C8B15E772B3673BB05FBECD44E6E4E37516AA9BCB58BD1E66EE48C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The proposed note states an opinion then proceeds to cite two articles which are morning more than two individuals opinions. Sources not reliable, opinion and speculation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840644037726154768
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8B711403D4C8B15E772B3673BB05FBECD44E6E4E37516AA9BCB58BD1E66EE48C
  • createdAtMillis - 1727694279037
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18406440377261547688B711403D4C8B15E772B3673BB05FBECD44E6E4E37516AA9BCB58BD1E66EE48C