Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-30 17:39:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CDC58FAA3E7252ED6B5F6C8AF2A324FA2A483F055F701427239D29E5FD3AC0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The proposed note states an opinion then proceeds to cite two articles which are morning more than two individuals opinions. Sources not reliable, opinion and speculation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840644037726154768
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4CDC58FAA3E7252ED6B5F6C8AF2A324FA2A483F055F701427239D29E5FD3AC0E
  • createdAtMillis - 1727717962038
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18406440377261547684CDC58FAA3E7252ED6B5F6C8AF2A324FA2A483F055F701427239D29E5FD3AC0E