Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-30 14:55:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E0EBC29471840CB30661C07FEF06C11E92308610DC929088B368E229211CE56
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The proposed note states an opinion then proceeds to cite two articles which are morning more than two individuals opinions. Sources not reliable, opinion and speculation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840644037726154768
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E0EBC29471840CB30661C07FEF06C11E92308610DC929088B368E229211CE56
  • createdAtMillis - 1727708158416
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18406440377261547680E0EBC29471840CB30661C07FEF06C11E92308610DC929088B368E229211CE56