Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-01 12:35:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 05B535F9C5CE95874BB06ACC6DA4D08DDB1D7311CF229478B7D7E2F71BF3E01A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The proposed note states an opinion then proceeds to cite two articles which are morning more than two individuals opinions. Sources not reliable, opinion and speculation

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840644037726154768
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 05B535F9C5CE95874BB06ACC6DA4D08DDB1D7311CF229478B7D7E2F71BF3E01A
  • createdAtMillis - 1727786112238
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184064403772615476805B535F9C5CE95874BB06ACC6DA4D08DDB1D7311CF229478B7D7E2F71BF3E01A