Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-30 02:59:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D1801AF24408ED68E5FD4241A75F98978E2A2AF715F9DCE4C8D5262DDD860A0D
Participant Details

Original Note:

コロナワクチンは、臨床試験で有効性と安全性に関して厳格な評価が行われた後に承認されています。 https://www.taro.org/2023/01/コロナワクチンに関するデマについて.php レプリコンワクチンも既存のコロナワクチンと安全性に差異ありません。 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/vaccine_qa.html#21

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840577094482567311
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D1801AF24408ED68E5FD4241A75F98978E2A2AF715F9DCE4C8D5262DDD860A0D
  • createdAtMillis - 1727665161458
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1840577094482567311D1801AF24408ED68E5FD4241A75F98978E2A2AF715F9DCE4C8D5262DDD860A0D