Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-30 08:46:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41A6243EF0C5E2F69F5A0D4006A468F4F7CBEC237CAE6ACCC5FB56ED687492FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

コロナワクチンは、臨床試験で有効性と安全性に関して厳格な評価が行われた後に承認されています。 https://www.taro.org/2023/01/コロナワクチンに関するデマについて.php レプリコンワクチンも既存のコロナワクチンと安全性に差異ありません。 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/vaccine_qa.html#21

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840577094482567311
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41A6243EF0C5E2F69F5A0D4006A468F4F7CBEC237CAE6ACCC5FB56ED687492FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1727686010035
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184057709448256731141A6243EF0C5E2F69F5A0D4006A468F4F7CBEC237CAE6ACCC5FB56ED687492FE