Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-01 07:55:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6B6F6560319ED5048910F015C8459D6B546E41BF86B2328D72687D89AC6FC169
Participant Details

Original Note:

Reading the OPs posts, this seems to be a trend of quoting ‘reliable’ sources. None of the OPs claims have been verified/ supported in legacy media or on X. The OP should provide more credence to quotes and not present unverified or unverifiable claims as fact per X rules. https://blog.x.com/en_us/topics/product/2020/updating-our-approach-to-misleading-information

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1840492767241543981
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 6B6F6560319ED5048910F015C8459D6B546E41BF86B2328D72687D89AC6FC169
createdAtMillis - 1727769328149
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18404927672415439816B6F6560319ED5048910F015C8459D6B546E41BF86B2328D72687D89AC6FC169