Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-30 14:38:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 272FD5DA9174FFE25FAA66730B5FA9AABF1C9F971E8CF469A1AFF5F2E86FA709
Participant Details

Original Note:

Reading the OPs posts, this seems to be a trend of quoting ‘reliable’ sources. None of the OPs claims have been verified/ supported in legacy media or on X. The OP should provide more credence to quotes and not present unverified or unverifiable claims as fact per X rules. https://blog.x.com/en_us/topics/product/2020/updating-our-approach-to-misleading-information

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1840492767241543981
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 272FD5DA9174FFE25FAA66730B5FA9AABF1C9F971E8CF469A1AFF5F2E86FA709
createdAtMillis - 1727707096137
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1840492767241543981272FD5DA9174FFE25FAA66730B5FA9AABF1C9F971E8CF469A1AFF5F2E86FA709