Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-30 02:20:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B492A3F280CF13A8EEEE00C0D4FD59A8E83E430A39C7C26D2A7EA8C8E8705973
Participant Details

Original Note:

Project 2025 (which Trump has denied being a part of) does not cut NOAA. It said it “should be broken up and downsized.” The National Weather Service “should focus on its data-gathering services,” and “should fully commercialize its forecasting operations.”: https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2024/project-2025-get-rid-noaa-national-weather-service/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840433813442408713
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B492A3F280CF13A8EEEE00C0D4FD59A8E83E430A39C7C26D2A7EA8C8E8705973
  • createdAtMillis - 1727662828476
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1840433813442408713B492A3F280CF13A8EEEE00C0D4FD59A8E83E430A39C7C26D2A7EA8C8E8705973