Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-29 18:10:50 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0E4F4003B48B73EC21DE34E445D64CE2439361F5433B21081B240D1377E0C75
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cette étude remonte à 1995, c'est loin d'être nouveau. L'auteur du post présente ça comme si c'était un scoop. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7582857/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840384728471425530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0E4F4003B48B73EC21DE34E445D64CE2439361F5433B21081B240D1377E0C75
  • createdAtMillis - 1727633450490
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1840384728471425530C0E4F4003B48B73EC21DE34E445D64CE2439361F5433B21081B240D1377E0C75