Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-29 20:55:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 649C5B1CFE0B6825E5AA9474A28090D0A986A2EB6A551EE2F6903B1C52655459
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cette étude remonte à 1995, c'est loin d'être nouveau. L'auteur du post présente ça comme si c'était un scoop. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7582857/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840384728471425530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 649C5B1CFE0B6825E5AA9474A28090D0A986A2EB6A551EE2F6903B1C52655459
  • createdAtMillis - 1727643306361
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1840384728471425530649C5B1CFE0B6825E5AA9474A28090D0A986A2EB6A551EE2F6903B1C52655459