Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-29 18:41:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C64FA06D535847CD20BB4E816FD8A000EDB440C26D564BDB6EACFBB665781C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cette étude remonte à 1995, c'est loin d'être nouveau. L'auteur du post présente ça comme si c'était un scoop. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7582857/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840384728471425530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C64FA06D535847CD20BB4E816FD8A000EDB440C26D564BDB6EACFBB665781C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1727635270532
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18403847284714255303C64FA06D535847CD20BB4E816FD8A000EDB440C26D564BDB6EACFBB665781C1