Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-29 15:36:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B158AA9790D69FACE246CC5DFDDDCB73860D6FD63881FEB1AA570307EBD53D61
Participant Details

Original Note:

Headline & article are misleading. The study does not show 0 cases; rather, a reduction. Study authors note 0 case data is thin & that VE CIs can’t be calculated. See the paper’s Adjusted Analysis section. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/jnci/djad263/7577291?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false#google_vignette

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840197967107555414
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B158AA9790D69FACE246CC5DFDDDCB73860D6FD63881FEB1AA570307EBD53D61
  • createdAtMillis - 1727624170547
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1840197967107555414B158AA9790D69FACE246CC5DFDDDCB73860D6FD63881FEB1AA570307EBD53D61