Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-02 06:16:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6577C1780F027496ECAA4F1FD0B351F8FB1210404A377FAA4CEE5D0D9610E218
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Der tweet ist nicht irreführend. Und auch der Artikel nicht. Ansonsten wunderschönes derailing: versteifen auf kleinste Details, wobei es nicht um die eigentliche Themen des Artikels geht.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840121510758924671
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6577C1780F027496ECAA4F1FD0B351F8FB1210404A377FAA4CEE5D0D9610E218
  • createdAtMillis - 1727849783163
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18401215107589246716577C1780F027496ECAA4F1FD0B351F8FB1210404A377FAA4CEE5D0D9610E218