Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-25 00:49:52 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 896CC9CD6885B1F17E96BF7E865658C568E676CF986F63F50A6814D3510FDE90
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ya de por sí una encuesta en Twitter no tiene ninguna validez, menos aún si la hace alguien que es seguido por una escasa minoría de la población, de ninguna manera se puede considerar una "macroencuesta". https://www.fbbva.es/diccionario/macroencuesta/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840074832039350766
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 896CC9CD6885B1F17E96BF7E865658C568E676CF986F63F50A6814D3510FDE90
  • createdAtMillis - 1729817392381
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1840074832039350766896CC9CD6885B1F17E96BF7E865658C568E676CF986F63F50A6814D3510FDE90