Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-29 09:52:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 371A0095339C8E97604AF5D0E5F5307E82DE350D67116D0EAB8B749503C2C936
Participant Details

Original Note:

La sentencia está anulada por no ajustarse a derecho: era un civil juzgado por un tribunal militar, se le aplicó una ley con carácter retroactivo, y no tuvo derecho a la defensa ya que su abogado fue expulsado durante fases cruciales del juicio y no se admitieron pruebas. https://youtu.be/IRsimQ_vYUc?si=pFaxEzVuxXstoKqr

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1840034313326219515
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 371A0095339C8E97604AF5D0E5F5307E82DE350D67116D0EAB8B749503C2C936
  • createdAtMillis - 1727603531504
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1840034313326219515371A0095339C8E97604AF5D0E5F5307E82DE350D67116D0EAB8B749503C2C936