Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-28 22:45:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C633035C192AB91E0DB1BA65AF061B3B8125B33A714B7BFF87DA08109D2176B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le voile n'est pas par nature un signe religieux. Les deux employées dont il est question n'ont donc enfreint aucune lois relatives à la laïcité. Il est en revanche possible que les véritables motivations derrière cette sanction et le post de M. Retailleau soient islamophobes. https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voile_(v%C3%AAtement)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839986754360586259
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C633035C192AB91E0DB1BA65AF061B3B8125B33A714B7BFF87DA08109D2176B8
  • createdAtMillis - 1727563506860
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839986754360586259C633035C192AB91E0DB1BA65AF061B3B8125B33A714B7BFF87DA08109D2176B8