Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-29 00:54:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 73C3AD957A441DD0E0ACF305210FEBF97E03928947302EAEC90D7C176435BCC0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, Meinung. Zudem hat der VerfGH nicht festgestellt, dass der Alterspräsident falsch gehandelt habe, wie ein Blick in den Tenor der Entscheidung zeigt.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839965613998944322
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 73C3AD957A441DD0E0ACF305210FEBF97E03928947302EAEC90D7C176435BCC0
  • createdAtMillis - 1727571281908
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183996561399894432273C3AD957A441DD0E0ACF305210FEBF97E03928947302EAEC90D7C176435BCC0