Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-28 06:34:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BB4E064ACFB1D740EFE101A01B4ECB902FD46A6CCFC7CE29FD66DE028CAB1A9B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Zwei der vier Anträge der CDU wurden abgewiesen; der CDU wurden nur die Hälfte der Kosten zugebilligt. Seite 3: https://verfassungsgerichtshof.thueringen.de/media/tmmjv_verfassungsgerichtshof/Entscheidungen/24-00036_Beschluss_nicht_barrierefrei.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839807985540890773
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BB4E064ACFB1D740EFE101A01B4ECB902FD46A6CCFC7CE29FD66DE028CAB1A9B
  • createdAtMillis - 1727505267602
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839807985540890773BB4E064ACFB1D740EFE101A01B4ECB902FD46A6CCFC7CE29FD66DE028CAB1A9B