Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-29 13:18:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4AFECEA5B7BF8F1801FEF421C05A25886098C1E6972C7EA27D6C7C8E3F16B0A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Zwei der vier Anträge der CDU wurden abgewiesen; der CDU wurden nur die Hälfte der Kosten zugebilligt. Seite 3: https://verfassungsgerichtshof.thueringen.de/media/tmmjv_verfassungsgerichtshof/Entscheidungen/24-00036_Beschluss_nicht_barrierefrei.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839807985540890773
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4AFECEA5B7BF8F1801FEF421C05A25886098C1E6972C7EA27D6C7C8E3F16B0A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1727615884780
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18398079855408907734AFECEA5B7BF8F1801FEF421C05A25886098C1E6972C7EA27D6C7C8E3F16B0A3