Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-28 01:41:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CC8FD715E98F1B8007AA557CF3C7CE38620B945AB1645AB0E86FD6FE630C07BB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The linked article abuses the Community Notes system to associate unpublished CNs as de facto proof of unfounded claims. The article admits that only ONE out of the 117 posts had a verified and accepted CN Paragraph 17: https://archive.ph/u9lX0 "only one post... had a visible note"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839745431997239343
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CC8FD715E98F1B8007AA557CF3C7CE38620B945AB1645AB0E86FD6FE630C07BB
  • createdAtMillis - 1727487660723
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839745431997239343CC8FD715E98F1B8007AA557CF3C7CE38620B945AB1645AB0E86FD6FE630C07BB