Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 19:59:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7F4F5886E13F4E7A16AE93E1B974CA5C49A7B91F03929AB0DEAA7FEEE8C6C32E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The linked article abuses the Community Notes system to associate unpublished CNs as de facto proof of unfounded claims. The article admits that only ONE out of the 117 posts had a verified and accepted CN Paragraph 17: https://archive.ph/u9lX0 "only one post... had a visible note"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839745431997239343
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7F4F5886E13F4E7A16AE93E1B974CA5C49A7B91F03929AB0DEAA7FEEE8C6C32E
  • createdAtMillis - 1727467188389
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18397454319972393437F4F5886E13F4E7A16AE93E1B974CA5C49A7B91F03929AB0DEAA7FEEE8C6C32E