Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 20:31:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1C244FBE6580E8E8A036FFAFEE0911B3909144E2534C8D22E5D52FCBD2382ED4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The linked article abuses the Community Notes system to associate unpublished CNs as de facto proof of unfounded claims. The article admits that only ONE out of the 117 posts had a verified and accepted CN Paragraph 17: https://archive.ph/u9lX0 "only one post... had a visible note"

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839745431997239343
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1C244FBE6580E8E8A036FFAFEE0911B3909144E2534C8D22E5D52FCBD2382ED4
  • createdAtMillis - 1727469080305
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18397454319972393431C244FBE6580E8E8A036FFAFEE0911B3909144E2534C8D22E5D52FCBD2382ED4