Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 21:25:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F8BF5465D3D82F1EF0B9E65040C9B672B12FE2DCCC73608922864BDDA592196C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter's claim that the ban is temporary is disproven by the correspondence Ken Klippenstein shared on his substack. Twitter advised Ken his account was not temporarily suspended but rather permanently banned. https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/my-twitter-ban-is-political?r=bwh5&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839728939125583884
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F8BF5465D3D82F1EF0B9E65040C9B672B12FE2DCCC73608922864BDDA592196C
  • createdAtMillis - 1727472310265
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839728939125583884F8BF5465D3D82F1EF0B9E65040C9B672B12FE2DCCC73608922864BDDA592196C