Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-27 19:40:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E25FEC4173D1ED853E60430D6545D3AEDCF5696311F40E2CE5A05C9AC486985E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter's claim that the ban is temporary is disproven by the correspondence Ken Klippenstein shared on his substack. Twitter advised Ken his account was not temporarily suspended but rather permanently banned. https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/my-twitter-ban-is-political?r=bwh5&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839728939125583884
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E25FEC4173D1ED853E60430D6545D3AEDCF5696311F40E2CE5A05C9AC486985E
  • createdAtMillis - 1727466039799
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1839728939125583884E25FEC4173D1ED853E60430D6545D3AEDCF5696311F40E2CE5A05C9AC486985E