Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-29 14:15:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B2E26601D741B921642BAED2010EE94FBAD6EE50276CB79C3CC27C4C98FEC1E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter's claim that the ban is temporary is disproven by the correspondence Ken Klippenstein shared on his substack. Twitter advised Ken his account was not temporarily suspended but rather permanently banned. https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/my-twitter-ban-is-political?r=bwh5&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1839728939125583884
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B2E26601D741B921642BAED2010EE94FBAD6EE50276CB79C3CC27C4C98FEC1E
  • createdAtMillis - 1727619316201
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18397289391255838845B2E26601D741B921642BAED2010EE94FBAD6EE50276CB79C3CC27C4C98FEC1E